Home Prices Decline 1.6% In October--Altos Research

One of my favorite home price indicators is Altos Research's 10 city composite. It is a leading indicator for Case-Shiller. Today Altos Research reported more bad news for the housing market with price declines reported in 25 of 26 markets. Overall, nationwide prices fell 1.6% in October and are no down 3.09% over the last three months.  Here are the highlights from the report:

November 2010 Highlights


The Altos 10-City Composite is now at $458,518, off 1.60% from last month.

Home prices fell in 25 of the 26 markets covered in the report.

Cities that felt decreases most sharply were San Diego (-3.28%), Salt Lake City (-3.27%), and Phoenix (-3.11%).

Three of the 26 markets covered in this report showed increases in inventory, and nationally, inventory was down 4.64%.
 
Housing Trends
 
In what is becoming a familiar pattern, the Altos 10-City Composite fell in October 2010. The index was off 1.52% in September and another 1.60% during October to $458,518. These decreases are in line with our Q4 expectations, though weekly declines in prices are slowing. December’s report should indicate less dramatic price declines, with a few bubbly exceptions.


San Diego showed the most significant decreases, with prices falling there by 3.28%, signaling that even in markets that have been less affected by the economic downturn are feeling the pinch of the strained economy. Other markets showing significant decreases were Salt Lake City, with a drop of 3.28% and Phoenix – the market that feels the most risky-- with a drop of 3.11%.
 
Housing Supply

As was the case in September, inventory across the country is decreasing, in some cases, significantly. Washington, DC had the biggest decrease at more than 16%, and inventory rose slightly in Las Vegas, Phoenix, and San Diego. Typically, decreases in inventory are evidence of a leveling off; that markets are settling. However, the spectre of shadow inventory remains, bringing with it questions about how foreclosures and short sales are being counted. The Altos 10-City index fell 4.64% in September.
Read more >>

Share/Bookmark

Will Gold Play Role In New Monetary Order?

It seems that we are on the precipice of an imminent global race to the bottom brought about through Keynesian ideology combined with fiat paper money.  This situation has some members of the banker elite concerned. World Bank President Robert Zoellick made some comments today about how to reform the bankrupt world monetary system that is currently on its last legs. The surprising aspect of his speech was his desire to include gold as a true measure of inflation and deflation! While Mr. Zoellick stopped short of advocating a return to a gold standard, his remarks were one of the first instances in which a prominent world bank official has seriously considered the idea. For the record, Zoellick wants to see a move away from the dollar to a more diversified mix of foreign currencies to make a reserve portfolio. From the FT article:
 "The system should also consider employing gold as an international reference point of market expectations about inflation, deflation and future currency values."

"Although textbooks may view gold as the old money, markets are using gold as an alternative monetary asset today."


It is no surprise that the elite are planning a new monetary order since the current Bretton Woods agreement has failed. The main problem with Bretton Woods was that it made the dollar the reserve currency held by all countries, with the dollar backed by gold. This system only worked as long as the US was willing to run large trade deficits which led to Triffin's dilemma. The concept developed by economist Robert Triffin noted that eventually the county supplying the reserve currency would eventually go bankrupt. The US faced this threat in 1971, which is why President Nixon put an end to dollar convertibility into gold. The US dodged a real bullet because if it had continued to convert dollars into gold, the US would have lost all of its gold and forced to end convertibility at a further date anyway. By stopping gold convertibility, the US bought itself some time.  All would be well as long as countries were willing to own dollars, which were guaranteed to depreciate and invest them in US treasuries. However, at a certain point, the amount of US debt becomes so large that the US is unable to service the debt. At this time, the US will do what all countries with fiat currencies do:  print money. The problem is that holders of US dollars (Chinese, Japanese, etc) wake up and decide to ditch the dollar before it is worthless. This is the endgame to Tiffin's dilemma-- a global wholesale dumping of dollars.

The only question at this point is what the new monetary order will look like. So far we have heard from the IMF which wants a global currency backed by a world central bank (the IMF, of course). The new currency would be called Bancor in honor of John Maynard Keynes. I do not have to tell you why this is a bad idea, but the mere fact that its inspiration comes from Keynes is enough to ditch the plan considering Keynesian philosophy is the cause of our economic problems.

The second idea, mentioned by Zoellick of a basket of reserve currencies is not the solution either. The problem is that fiat paper money has no intrinsic value and can be electronically created by central banks. Any new monetary system has to be backed by something of value which can not be printed at will. The natural solution is a gold standard, where a currency is 85-90% backed by gold or some basket of commodities. This would still leave a little bit of monetary flexibility to deal with economic shocks, but not enough to destroy the currency. It would also dramatically reduce inflation and force governments to reduce spending. No longer could governments rely on inflation to reduce their debt burdens. The only problem with this solution is that it is not politically acceptable. Politicians would no longer be able to bribe the electorate with free stuff because they would have to actually be able to deliver on their promises instead of printing money. The new gold standard would also require countries to end their welfare states because they would no longer be affordable. In Europe and the US, welfare is used to pacify the public and keep them dependent on government. The current system ensures political stability as the people cannot afford to rebel against the government even if it is robbing them blind. After all, no government means no welfare. This is why a return to the gold standard will only come about when all fiat currencies collapse.    

Black Swan Insights
Read more >>

Share/Bookmark

Andy Xie On Why QE 2 Is Destined To Fail

The always insightful Andy Xie is out with a piece in China International business which discusses why Bernanke's desperate attempt to debase the dollar to increase exports will fail. He notes that the Federal Reserve is desperate to re-inflate the US economy and has resorted to currency debasement as the preferred solution. However, surplus countries (mainly Asian) will simply not allow the dollar to drop and will constantly intervene to weaken their currencies to maintain export competitiveness. In effect, these countries have check mated the US as the Fed is unable to lower the value of the dollar through QE 2. Yes, commodity prices will rise, but the nominal exchange rate will stay the same because of currency intervention by our trading partners. It is all part of the race to the bottom.  From Mr. Xie's article:
It seems that nobody wants to appreciate. Most major economies will do something to keep their currencies down. That is checkmate for the US. Without the devaluation benefit on rising exports, QE just leads to inflation, first through rising oil prices. The American people are suffering from declining housing prices and high unemployment. If the gasoline price doubles, the country may not be stable. How would the elite react? Probably more of the same.

The world is heading towards high inflation and political instability. It's only a matter of time before there is another global crisis. The first sign would be a collapsing treasury market. The Fed is controlling the yield curve through its QE program. But, it is irrational for other investors to play this game. The only reason to stay in is that the Fed won't let the market fall. But, the underlying value is evaporating with rising money supply and the inflationary consequences. When all the investors realize this, they will run for the exits and the Fed won't be able to stop the stampede. If it prints enough money to take over the whole market, the people with freshly minted dollars would surely want to convert their money into other assets. The dollar would collapse too.

The world seems on course for another crisis in 2012. The same people who caused the last crisis are still in charge. They'll get us into another. Iceland is sending its former prime minister to court for causing the banking crisis. A worse fate awaits the people who are causing the next crisis.

I really like Mr.Xie's characterization of the treasury market and how it is nothing more than a ponzi scheme with everyone trying to front run the Fed. The problem arises when market participants realize that the value of the dollar is collapsing and they abandon their attempts to realize a 10% gain in treasuries to convert their proceeds into hard assets. Eventually, the value of the dollar will play a role in the Treasury market, but for the time being, no one seems concerned about the dramatic loss in the dollar's purchasing power. When the Treasury market starts to move against the Fed with rising interest rates, the US will be done once and for all. The Fed will no doubt claim to see "deflationary signals" and start to print more money to keep yields low. This will cause a flight from the dollar as market participants wake up to the fact the dollar is worthless and will be printed to infinity.

The one part of the article I disagree with is the part about the elites ever being prosecuted. The US elite are in full control of the US political economy and have little reason for concern. They just got away with one of the largest frauds in US history as evidenced through the 2008-2009 financial crisis. Have there been any prosecutions as a result? Of course not! In fact, the bankster CEOs have profited through egregious bonuses and stock options. The worst case scenario for these CEOs was a one year (2008) deferral of their multi-million dollar bonuses. In 2009-2010 they simply doubled their usual bonuses to make up for the loss in 2008. It is a good scam if you can get it. The most depressing aspect has been the weak reaction by the American public from being raped financially to the tune of trillions of dollars. The US public has shown very little interest about the criminal acts which have transpired during the financial crisis. They don't fully understand the consequences of the banksters implosion of the US economy.

Black Swan Insights
Read more >>

Share/Bookmark

Money Printing and Commodity Prices

Here is a chart from Finviz.com which shows the top commodity performers since the beginning of the year. You can see how the S&P 500 has not done well compared to real things like gold, silver, and agricultural commodities. The curious standout among the bunch is natural gas which seems impervious to money printing.

click chart for larger image


Read more >>

Share/Bookmark

Obamacare Will Cost Me An Extra $1308 Next Year

Just a quick note regarding Obamacare. Today I received a letter from my health insurance provider which said they will be increasing my premium $109 per month, an extra $1308 per year. I called the company and asked why they were doing this, and they said it was the result of the health care program passed by Congress. I knew Obamacare was nothing more than a ploy to bankrupt America, but I did not know that it would be increasing my premium immediately. Thanks Barry Soetoro...err... Barack H. Obama, or whatever your name is, for your glorious health care program. It does nothing for people like me who already have health care coverage, except tax me a little more. I really hope the Republicans in the House de-fund this program and block its implementation at all costs. It was written by the insurance companies to increase their profits. One last thing regarding this health care debate, I am so sick and tired of the liberals running their mouths about how 45 million people do not have insurance-- and it is a national emergency. There are 310 million Americans, which means 85.5% of the population has health insurance. Of the 45 million who do not have health insurance, the majority of them are young people under 35 who do not want it. I have looked up the numbers and found that you can purchase health insurance for around $150 per month with a $3,000 deductible. This goes to show you that many people without health insurance could purchase it if they wanted to. The only people who need special attention are people with pre-existing conditions. The simple plan would be for the government to set up some kind of insurance pool for these people to help lower the cost. No need for nationalized health care or a government take over, just a little common sense. Also, we cannot forget the illegal aliens who leach from taxpayers to the tune of billions. The answer is not to give them anything! Their presence increases the cost of health care for every citizen, without them we could dramatically lower costs and make health care insurance more affordable for everyone.  

Black Swan Insights 
Read more >>

Share/Bookmark

Jobs Report Better Than Expected, But Still Bleak

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported non-farm payroll employment increased 151,000 in October, while the unemployment rate held steady at 9.6%. On the face of it the number looked positive. According to the Establishment Survey Data private sector job growth totaled 159,000 showing that there was an uptick in hiring in October. The real problem for the economy is that this is not enough to actually reduce the unemployment rate because it barely keeps up with new entrants into the jobs market. In a previous article we covered a study by the San Francisco Fed which showed the economy had to create 100,000 per month just keep the unemployment rate steady. This month was slightly ahead but will not materially impact the unemployment rate. To really see improvement you would have create 200,000-250,000 new jobs per month. 





One of the most troubling aspects of the jobs report is the average duration of unemployed workers. The chart below shows how many people have been unemployed for 15+ weeks and 27+ weeks. Both numbers increased during the latest month by 267,000 and 83,000 respectively.



Black Swan Insights

Read more >>

Share/Bookmark

Time To Dump Your Federal Reserve Notes

We truly live in incredible times when government propaganda is considered truth, and reason has been abandoned. With the recent announcement of QE 2 (code name for money printing), the Fed along with the media has declared to the public that its only desire is to "boost" the economy. Despite the fact that QE 1 did nothing for the real economy, the media elite will continue to claim that money printing helps increase employment and shows the Fed cares about the economy. The Federal Reserve will continue to deceive investors (and our trading partners) by claiming QE 2--and 3,4,5,etc.-- will be temporary and should not be considered debt monetization. Economists will further support the Fed by devising bogus computer models which predict 2-3% inflation for the next decade, confirming the fact that money printing is not inflationary. The deflationists (MISH and others) will continue to lead their flocks astray by saying there can never be inflation without velocity. What they fail to understand is that once velocity picks up, it can accelerate at an alarming rate (sometimes it can go parabolic), and once it does, it is too late. The inflation genie will be out of the bottle. No reverse repo from the Fed to drain liquidity is going to stop it. The great inflation which awaits the US and world economies will take most people by surprise and leave billions of people impoverished. However, the elite will do incredibly well as they own real assets like real estate, operating businesses, and gold.

The most disturbing fact is that after inflation occurs, the government will continue its deception regarding the true cause of inflation. The President and Fed Chairman will tell the public inflation is the result of nefarious speculators who have driven up prices. Or perhaps the government will follow what President Gerald Ford did in 1974-1975 by announcing an Orwellian police state style "WIN" program, which stood for Whip Inflation Now. This campaign to stop inflation was a fantastic farce, considering that the government itself was responsible for the inflation, courtesy of the Fed printing money and excessive credit growth. In a determined speech, Gerald Ford told the gullible public that inflation was some kind of external phenomenon which could only be stopped by actions of the public working together. To combat rising food prices the President instructed farmers to produce more food, completely overlooking the real source of inflation--monetary policy. He also announced that the government would monitor and try to influence the production and pricing of energy (oil, and gas) to prevent bid-rigging and price gouging. Of course, all of these specious ideas failed as inflation continued to stay in the double digits. However, it helped to distract the public from ever really understanding why prices were surging, despite high unemployment and a weak economy.

Today, we face a situation that is in many ways similar to the 1970s and yet worse in other ways. The US has sky high real unemployment of around 17%, surging commodity prices and weak growth. Further compounding the problem is that  the US economy is in secular decline as globalization outsources good jobs to foreign countries while creating more McJobs in the US. To be sure, this works great for the multi-nationals which no longer need the US as they once did. Instead, they benefit from the growth in emerging markets whose success has been underwritten by the US. These developing countries, particularly in Asia, have only done well because they can export an unlimited amount of goods to the US, while manipulating their currencies to maintain a competitive advantage. This process has left the US with nothing but debt and a low-paying service economy. To counter this reality, the Federal Reserve has provided asset bubbles to keep the public feeling wealthy and serving to fuel a historic credit bubble. But alas, the final credit bubble in housing has backfired and almost destroyed the economy To counter this collapse, the Federal Reserve has resorted to the policies of banana republics such as printing money. Sure, the money printing is disguised under the veil of quantitative easing, but this charade only fools the ignorant.

The purpose of money printing has and always will be debt monetization. The US economy is for all practical purposes bankrupt. The only thing keeping the ponzi scheme alive is money printing. The Federal Reserve is so supercilious in its power over the people that it openly announces its plan to print trillions of dollars to inflate stock prices. Truly, a first in modern economic history, when a central bank is so brazen as to publicly boast of its intentions because it fears no push back by the populace. In fact, the Fed is correct: There is nothing you or I can do to stop this criminal confiscation of our wealth from occurring.

The only action left to holders of money wealth (no matter how small or large) is to abandon the US dollar as our unit of wealth. This is our form of revolt as the great author Jens O. Parsson postulated in his seminal work on inflation called "Dying of Money: Lessons of the Great German and American Inflations." In it, he notes "They[holders of money] do not fly flags or demonstrate in the streets to express their revolt; they simply get rid of their money." It may not be as spectacular as thousands of Americans storming the walls of the New York Fed, but in many ways, it is equally as powerful. When enough holders of wealth dump the dollar, the velocity of money goes vertical, which unleashes the inflationary potential of government money printing; in that moment, the government will cease to have its monopoly over money. Parsson notes that once this occurs, "government has little or nothing to say or do about it" because they cannot stop it. Whether the US simply experiences high inflation (10-20% per year) or enters hyperinflation (more than 50%) is immaterial. After watching in bewilderment the actions taken by the government, I choose not to hold Federal Reserve Notes as a store of value. I do not want my wealth hostage to government whims.

I will not simply stand by and let the government steal my hard earned money through inflation. I do not want to end up like the poor Germans of the Weimar Republic who were taken by surprise as their life savings vanished within months at the hand of their own government. The elderly were particularly hit by the hyperinflation because they lived on fixed incomes and had the majority of their wealth in bonds. Some elderly couples gassed themselves in their own homes in despair of losing everything, showing the destructive power of inflation in the real world. I wish Bernanke understood this fact, but tragically he sees inflation as a means to a healthy economy.  I do not want to be left dependent on government handouts when the US dollar has lost all of its value. Protect yourself!

Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing I have 50% of my wealth in gold and will be promptly converting the rest into gold as soon as possible. I still own a small amount of Stans Energy and Allana Potash (less than 4% of the portfolio). Goodbye, FRNs, except for day to day purposes.

Black Swan Insights
Read more >>

Share/Bookmark

AAII Bearish Sentiment Surges

The American Association of Independent Investors released its weekly poll of investor sentiment. Bullish sentiment fell to 48.23%, down from 51.20% last week and bearish sentiment surged to 29.79%, up from 21.60%. Investors who were neutral on the market came in at 22%.

This was a very bizarre report from the AAII since bearish sentiment rose dramatically despite a rising market environment, which is very rare. This indicates retailers were probably nervous going into the elections and the Fed meeting. From a contrary perspective this is slightly bullish and means that average investor does not trust this rally.

Frankly, I would be very cautious at this point regarding the AAII sentiment survey. It has been flashing a sell signal for about 6 weeks now and the market has continue to surge. I think QE 2 has distorted all market indicators.

Here is a short term chart of AAII sentiment

click charts for larger image



















Here is a longer term chart which compares AAII bullish sentiment to the S&P 500


















Here is a chart which compares AAII bearish sentiment to the S&P 500




















Black Swan Insights
Read more >>

Share/Bookmark

Jobless Claims Rise

The Department of Labor reported initial jobless claims rose in the week ending Oct. 30. The number came in at a seasonally adjusted rate of 457,000, an increase of 20,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 437,000. The 4-week moving average was 456,000, an increase of 2,000 from the previous week's revised average of 454,000. You can see from the chart below the 4-week average has been stuck above 450,000 for quite some time. Employers are not confident enough about the economy to hire permanent workers. However, they are very willing to hire temporary workers according to the American Staffing Association's weekly index. I doubt more criminal money printing by the Fed will encourage companies to hire more workers.

click chart for larger image




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Black Swan Insights
Read more >>

Share/Bookmark

Links: Bernanke, Fed, and Hyperinflation

Anyone who has ever read this blog knows that I am somewhat obsessed with inflation, the Fed, and dollar debasement. Here are some links to my more popular posts covering these themes. They are more germane than ever after the Fed's QE 2 program--especially if Goldman's prediction of future money printing in the range of $2-4 trillion comes to pass in 2011-2012.  

Bernanke Explains How To Escape The "Liquidity Trap"--Bernnake clearly outlined his plan to avoid a liquidity trap. So far, he has been following this plan 100%

All Credibility Lost: Bernanke and Fed Face Tough Criticism by Hedge Fund Manager

Is The Fed Really Out of Bullets?

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard: "The Fed Is Out Of Control"

US Economic Outlook--3 Possible Scenarios

Elite Bankers Preparing for Hyperinflation-Evans-Pritchard---the banksters are reading the book "Dying of Money"

Surviving Hyperinflation--this was written in early July, before QE 2 was even on the table.

Cat's Out of the Bag: Fed's Own Research Predicts QE 2 Failure
Read more >>

Share/Bookmark